<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog @ spacebarpress &#187; Follies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spacebarpress.com/blog/tag/follies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spacebarpress.com/blog</link>
	<description>Life as a wannabe freelance writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 15:31:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Just Say No</title>
		<link>http://spacebarpress.com/blog/2009/04/just-say-no/</link>
		<comments>http://spacebarpress.com/blog/2009/04/just-say-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Follies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacebarpress.com/blog/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that the Fox network has decided to &#8216;just say no&#8217; to President Obama. They&#8217;ve announced that they&#8217;re not going to air his next primetime news conference, instead preferring to keep their regularly scheduled programming intact. They said they&#8217;ll run an on-screen graphic referring viewers to Fox News, but they&#8217;re actually declining the President&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that the Fox network has decided to <a title="Fox just says no to President Obama" href="http://news-briefs.ew.com/2009/04/fox-to-air-lie.html">&#8216;just say no&#8217; to President Obama</a>. They&#8217;ve announced that they&#8217;re not going to air his next primetime news conference, instead preferring to keep their regularly scheduled programming intact. They said they&#8217;ll run an on-screen graphic referring viewers to Fox News, but they&#8217;re actually declining the President&#8217;s request.</p>
<p>Who else but Fox could get away with just saying no to the President?</p>
<p>Have you ever said no to someone in management before?</p>
<p>Ever had one of those *gulp* type of moments where the thought &#8220;was that a CLM (career-limiting move)?&#8221; runs screaming through your head the moment the words leave your mouth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://spacebarpress.com/blog/2009/04/just-say-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are We Taking TV Warnings Too Far?</title>
		<link>http://spacebarpress.com/blog/2009/04/are-we-taking-tv-warnings-too-far/</link>
		<comments>http://spacebarpress.com/blog/2009/04/are-we-taking-tv-warnings-too-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Follies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacebarpress.com/blog/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amusement of the Week
This week I was watching some reruns of Entourage on MuchMore (previously known as MuchMoreMusic, MuchMusic&#8217;s alternate channel) when I noticed something strange. If you&#8217;ve ever watched Entourage, you know that there&#8217;s a lot of coarse language and definitely mature, adult situations. Because of this the TV network played one of those [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>Amusement of the Week</strong></span></h1>
<p>This week I was watching some reruns of Entourage on <a title="MuchMore" href="http://www.muchmore.ca">MuchMore </a>(previously known as MuchMoreMusic, <a title="MuchMusic" href="http://www.muchmusic.ca">MuchMusic</a>&#8217;s alternate channel) when I noticed something strange. If you&#8217;ve ever watched <a title="Entourage" href="www.hbo.com/entourage/">Entourage</a>, you know that there&#8217;s a lot of coarse language and definitely mature, adult situations. Because of this the TV network played one of those &#8220;viewer discretion is advised&#8221; warnings when they came back from each commercial break. Only this warning was different. That&#8217;s why it caught my eye, or ear, rather. Listen to this:</p>
<blockquote><p>This program contains extremeley coarse language, mature themes and nudity, and is not suitable for younger audiences. Even some adults may be offended.</p></blockquote>
<p>What caught my ear was the last statement, &#8220;Even some adults may be offended.&#8221; The rest of the warning wasn&#8217;t good enough? Why do we have to say it&#8217;s only unsuitable for &#8220;younger audiences&#8221;? Can&#8217;t you simply say &#8220;&#8230;and is not suitable for all audiences&#8221;? That would cover everyone, wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Aside from my amusement at this warning as a writer, I am actually a bit annoyed with all of these warnings in general. Every show on tv now has a warning, and up until this new MuchMore warning my favourite was the one seen on Fox&#8217;s Bones, which talked about how the show contains &#8220;forensic content&#8221;, so &#8220;viewer discretion is advised&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://spacebarpress.com/blog/2009/04/are-we-taking-tv-warnings-too-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Job Fail: Why Doing the Job Yourself Is Important</title>
		<link>http://spacebarpress.com/blog/2009/03/job-fail-why-doing-the-job-yourself-is-important/</link>
		<comments>http://spacebarpress.com/blog/2009/03/job-fail-why-doing-the-job-yourself-is-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Follies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacebarpress.com/blog/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found this posting for a writer on Craigslist:
I need someone to help edit my resume to fit under a Technical Writer for a fashion company, as well as letters of reference from stating I was a technical writer and did these tasks.
I have most of the information for you, I just need someone to write [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found this posting for a writer on Craigslist:</p>
<blockquote><p>I need someone to help edit my resume to fit under a Technical Writer for a fashion company, as well as letters of reference from stating I was a technical writer and did these tasks.</p>
<p>I have most of the information for you, I just need someone to write a couple pages and edit my resume. I will need someone to research this job title function in the fashion industry.</p>
<p>$150 flat</p></blockquote>
<p>What&#8217;s hilarious about this is that in the first paragraph he says he needs someone to help edit his resume &amp; reference letters. Okay, as a writer I can understand wanting to get another pair of eyes on something I&#8217;ve written. Sure. But then, he says that he &#8220;(has) most of the information&#8230;(and) just needs someone to write a couple of pages&#8230;&#8221; Uhm, but didn&#8217;t you say you just needed an edit?</p>
<p>My quesiton at this point is a simple one: Do you just need an edit or do you need someone to write it all up for you?</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s the latter, then just say so. Actually, you could probably go to a resume writing service and get the work done for the same amount of money. So it&#8217;s not like he&#8217;s really saving any money.</p>
<p>This is why I love reading the writing job posts on Craigslist. Some of them are just so funny. But this one has a bad odour to it, in my opinion. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://spacebarpress.com/blog/2009/03/job-fail-why-doing-the-job-yourself-is-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
